Introduction
Mohammed Saqib has been a tenant at 33 Bedford Row since July 2019. He has built a strong reputation as a versatile and accomplished barrister with a multidisciplinary practice spanning crime, civil, and family law. He is known for his professionalism, analytical precision, and commitment to achieving the best outcomes for his clients.
In criminal law, Mohammed is regularly instructed in serious and complex cases, including conspiracies to supply drugs, firearms offences, and large-scale money laundering matters. His recent successes include securing an acquittal in a £54.4 million money laundering conspiracy and achieving favourable results in parole and prison law proceedings involving high-profile offenders. His advocacy is marked by clarity, composure, and strategic foresight.
In civil law, Mohammed undertakes niche and high-value matters, often alongside senior members of Chambers. He has represented high-net-worth individuals and acted against local authorities on behalf of care home businesses, including cases involving multi-million-pound share transactions. He has also independently handled boundary and land disputes, demonstrating precision and attention to detail in complex litigation.
His family law practice is defined by empathy and discretion, and he is regularly instructed in both private and public law proceedings, including matters involving domestic abuse, child arrangements, and financial remedies. His calm and considered approach has earned him a reputation for professionalism and sound judgment.
An acknowledged expert in road traffic and driving matters, Mohammed is frequently instructed by high-profile individuals, including music artists and professional athletes, who value his discretion and ability to balance legal and reputational considerations. His persuasive advocacy has resulted in numerous acquittals and CPS discontinuances.
He is regularly led by senior members of the Bar in complex and multi-handed proceedings and is consistently commended for his intellect, composure, and advocacy. Solicitors frequently request him by name, reflecting his growing reputation as a barrister of choice for demanding cases.
Mohammed accepts Direct Access instructions, allowing clients to benefit directly from his expertise. Increasingly sought after by clients from the entertainment, sporting, and business sectors, he is recognised for his ability to manage sensitive matters with discretion and strategic insight. His blend of legal excellence, assured confidentiality, and measured advocacy has earned him the confidence of a distinguished and expanding client base.
Memberships
- Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn
- Criminal Bar Association
- Young Legal Aid Lawyers
Notable Cases
2023: R v CT – Isleworth Crown Court
Represented CT, who faced allegations of commercial-scale cannabis cultivation. After a fully contested trial, the Jury were unable to reach a verdict, resulting in a hung Jury.
2023: R v FA – Harrow Crown Court
Acted for FT in a five-handed conspiracy to kidnap. Successful half-time submissions led to a ruling of no case to answer. FT was acquitted, with the trial continuing only against his co-defendants.
2023: R v KD – Ipswich Magistrates’ Court
Represented a high-profile former England and Premier League footballer in an exceptional hardship application. The matter drew considerable public interest due to the client’s profile.
2024: R v AL – Snaresbrook Crown Court
Defended AL, a Chinese national, in a complex £54.4 million money-laundering conspiracy. After a four-month trial and eight days of Jury deliberation, AL was found Not Guilty of money laundering.
2024: R v CO – Nottingham Crown Court
Successfully defended a medical doctor charged with four counts of sexual assault said to have occurred in a hospital setting. The Jury returned unanimous Not Guilty verdicts on all counts.
2025: R v YY – Southwark Crown Court
Represented YY on a 14-count indictment involving allegations of possessing firearms and ammunition with intent to endanger life. The case concerned serious and complex firearms allegations requiring meticulous preparation and analysis.
2025: R v AA – Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court
Represented a defendant in a major cannabis production case involving 510 plants and an estimated annual yield valued between £1 million and £1.75 million. Following detailed analysis and challenge of the prosecution’s evidence, the Crown Prosecution Service offered no evidence. The defendant was formally acquitted on all counts.